Author(s): Michael Jasper
This paper addresses architectural composition, interrogating its capacity in open space, circulation elements, and built form to make manifest diverse time and scale complexities. It does this through an analysis of Peter Eisenman’s unbuilt project for the University Art Museum, Long Beach (1986-1988). The paper is founded on two propositions. The first is that Eisenman’s project provides an alternative approach to thinking architecture’s relation to urban scale form and the city more generally, one less bound to singular types, operational requirements, and overt contextual references in favour of other factors. The second proposition is that certain form generation strategies and composition devices have more or less capacity to register multiple layers, whether they be topographic, social, programmatic, or formal. A number of interconnected themes bracket the analysis given architectural translation in the devices of scaling, registration and superposition; providing Eisenman an armature to register and control plan dispositions; as artificial ground, signalling a cut and an edge; and as marking the disappearance of a golden time in Eisenman’s relation to certain architectural-urban conditions. Unpublished materials from the Eisenman archives held at the Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal, provide primary source material for the research. The paper makes a contribution to scholarship on the work of Eisenman, adds to studies on architecture-urban composition, and addresses the major Congress theme of intense asymmetric flows impacting architectural-urban form and aspects of Track 1 Diversity and Mixture with its emphasis on diverse kinds of architectural-urbanistic practices.
Volume Editors
ISBN
978-1-944214-31-9